LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-04

    How AI assistants see foundr.com

    foundr.com has an AI visibility score of 70/100. The site passed 25 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Entity Definition and Content Structure.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read foundr.com

    Readability90/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent sentence length and clarity, making it highly accessible for LLM processing.

    Schema.org Markup68/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Core technical schemas are present, but missing critical content-specific schemas (Course, Article).

    Authority & Trust Signals64/100

    Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong publication dates and contact info, but lacks structured author credentials and social proof schema.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    High number of inline links, but lacks citations to high-authority external primary sources.

    Content Freshness65/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Dates are clearly defined in metadata, though the content itself is over a year old.

    Content Structure58/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Multiple H1s and skipped heading levels hinder structural clarity for LLMs.

    Entity Definition58/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Good brand consistency and About page, but lacks Person schema for key instructors.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and social metadata.

    How foundr.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
    • Enhance Author Credentials (high priority)
    • Improve Paragraph Depth (medium priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Links (medium priority)

    How foundr.com compares to its competitors