AI search visibility report ยท 2026-06-04
How AI assistants see udemy.com
udemy.com has an AI visibility score of 48/100. The site passed 14 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read udemy.com
Readability25/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely poor readability scores due to massive sentence lengths in the scraped text.
Schema.org Markup54/100
Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Valid JSON-LD present but limited to basic WebSite schema; missing core business schemas like Course.
Authority & Trust Signals37/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong contact and trust pages, but lacks instructor credentials and publication dates on the homepage.
Citation & Source Quality40/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Minimal external citations to authoritative sources; links are primarily internal navigation.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No structured or visible dates found to indicate content recency.
Content Structure75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good semantic HTML and organization, but critical failure on H1 hierarchy.
Entity Definition43/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
About page is present, but lacks Organization and Person schema to define entities for LLMs.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social metadata.
How udemy.com can improve its AI visibility
- Fix Missing H1 Heading (high priority)
- Implement Course and Organization Schema (high priority)
- Reduce Sentence Length for Better Tokenization (high priority)
- Add Visible Content Dates (medium priority)
- Enhance Author/Instructor Credentials (medium priority)
How udemy.com compares to its competitors
- Coursera (coursera.org) โ score 57/100
- LinkedIn Learning (linkedin.com)
- Pluralsight (pluralsight.com) โ score 51/100
- edX (edx.org) โ score 56/100