LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-07

    How AI assistants see coursera.org

    coursera.org has an AI visibility score of 57/100. The site passed 18 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read coursera.org

    Readability35/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely poor readability scores due to massive sentence lengths and complex structure, making it difficult for LLMs to extract clear facts.

    Schema.org Markup82/100

    Result: strong. 5 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid JSON-LD present with FAQ and Organization schemas, though completeness of properties could be improved.

    Authority & Trust Signals40/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong trust pages and contact info, but lacks visible publication dates and structured social proof (reviews) in schema on the homepage.

    Citation & Source Quality47/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of inline citations for internal navigation, but lacks external authoritative references to primary sources or educational standards.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Complete absence of date-based metadata or visible update signals, which is a significant negative signal for LLM recency algorithms.

    Content Structure76/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy and use of semantic HTML sections, though paragraph structure is slightly skewed toward very short snippets.

    Entity Definition65/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong brand consistency and About page presence, but lacks structured author/instructor identification.

    Technical Accessibility93/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access, social meta tags, and JS-independent content.

    How coursera.org can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Visible Publication and Modification Dates (high priority)
    • Improve Sentence-Level Readability (high priority)
    • Implement Author/Instructor Schema (medium priority)
    • Enhance Term Definitions for Entities (medium priority)
    • Strengthen External Authority Citations (low priority)

    How coursera.org compares to its competitors