LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-08

    How AI assistants see crossplane.io

    crossplane.io has an AI visibility score of 42/100. The site passed 11 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read crossplane.io

    Readability80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is clear and uses appropriate sentence lengths, though slightly technical.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Complete absence of JSON-LD or any structured data markup.

    Authority & Trust Signals40/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong social proof with company logos, but lacks structured author credentials and specific publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality48/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks authoritative outbound links to external documentation or industry standards (.gov/.edu).

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No specific publication or modification dates found in metadata or visible text.

    Content Structure51/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Good paragraph structure but fails on heading hierarchy (multiple H1s) and semantic HTML usage.

    Entity Definition50/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Brand consistency is strong, but lacks a dedicated about page and author identification.

    Technical Accessibility85/100

    Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and JS independence, though meta description is slightly long.

    How crossplane.io can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Structured Data (JSON-LD) (high priority)
    • Define Entity and Authorship (high priority)
    • Implement Visible Date Signals (medium priority)
    • Optimize Heading Hierarchy and Semantic HTML (medium priority)
    • Optimize Meta Description Length (low priority)

    How crossplane.io compares to its competitors