AI search visibility report · 2026-10-18
How AI assistants see geckoterminal.com
geckoterminal.com has an AI visibility score of 45/100. The site passed 12 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read geckoterminal.com
Readability90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent readability scores with clear sentence structures.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD schema blocks were found on the page.
Authority & Trust Signals24/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
The site lacks contact information and publication dates, though it has basic trust pages.
Citation & Source Quality48/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Outbound links are present but lack citations to authoritative academic or news sources.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No visible publication or modification dates were detected in the HTML or schema.
Content Structure78/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good heading hierarchy and semantic tags, but lacks section elements for organization.
Entity Definition48/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Has an about page link but lacks author identification and schema-based definitions.
Technical Accessibility85/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent AI crawler access and JS independence, but meta description is too long.
How geckoterminal.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
- Add Verifiable Contact Information (high priority)
- Display Content Update Signals (high priority)
- Optimize Meta Description Length (medium priority)
- Define Brand Entities with Schema (medium priority)
How geckoterminal.com compares to its competitors
- DEX Screener (dexscreener.com) — score 59/100
- DEXTools (dextools.io) — score 48/100
- CoinMarketCap DexScan (coinmarketcap.com) — score 79/100
- Birdeye (birdeye.so) — score 59/100