AI search visibility report · 2026-10-22
How AI assistants see avvo.com
avvo.com has an AI visibility score of 47/100. The site passed 15 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Structure and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read avvo.com
Readability60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
The content is difficult to read (Flesch 36.0) despite good sentence lengths.
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core schemas are present and valid, but content-specific schemas (like FAQ or Organization) are missing.
Authority & Trust Signals16/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
The site lacks basic contact information and publication dates, though it has strong trust pages.
Citation & Source Quality27/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No inline citations or links to authoritative primary sources like government sites.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No visible or schema-based dates were detected on the homepage.
Content Structure76/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage. Paragraphs are well-structured.
Entity Definition40/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Missing a dedicated about page and author identification for the featured content.
Technical Accessibility73/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Content is accessible without JS, but social metadata is incomplete.
How avvo.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Verifiable Contact Information (high priority)
- Implement Publication Dates (high priority)
- Add Authoritative Outbound Links (medium priority)
- Define Organization Entity (medium priority)
- Complete Social Meta Tags (low priority)
How avvo.com compares to its competitors
- Martindale-Hubbell (martindale.com) — score 52/100
- Justia Law (justia.com) — score 79/100
- FindLaw (findlaw.com) — score 79/100
- Lawyers.com (lawyers.com) — score 75/100