AI search visibility report ยท 2026-06-21
How AI assistants see forgerock.com
forgerock.com has an AI visibility score of 52/100. The site passed 14 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read forgerock.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Content is extremely dense and academic (Flesch 14.7), with sentences far exceeding the ideal length for LLM parsing.
Schema.org Markup80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core Organization and WebSite schemas are perfectly implemented, but no content-level schemas (Article, FAQ) are present.
Authority & Trust Signals40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong trust pages and social proof (Gartner MQ), but lacks specific author credentials and granular publication dates.
Citation & Source Quality47/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
High volume of internal/partner links, but lacks citations to independent third-party authoritative sources (.gov, .edu).
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Critical failure: No visible or metadata-based publication or modification dates found on the analyzed page.
Content Structure56/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of semantic HTML sections, but fails basic hierarchy due to the total absence of an H1 tag.
Entity Definition60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent brand consistency and a strong About page, but lacks Person schema for key leadership or authors.
Technical Accessibility89/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and JS independence, though social meta tags are slightly incomplete.
How forgerock.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Visible Temporal Signals (high priority)
- Fix Heading Hierarchy (Missing H1) (high priority)
- Expand Content-Specific Schema (medium priority)
- Enhance Author Authority Signals (medium priority)
- Improve Content Readability (low priority)
How forgerock.com compares to its competitors
- Okta (okta.com) โ score 57/100
- Microsoft Entra (microsoft.com)
- Auth0 (by Okta) (auth0.com) โ score 49/100
- OneLogin (onelogin.com) โ score 54/100