LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14

    How AI assistants see asana.com

    asana.com has an AI visibility score of 78/100. The site passed 28 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Structure and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read asana.com

    Readability90/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    High clarity and professional tone. Jargon is used but generally contextualized within the SaaS industry.

    Schema.org Markup80/100

    Result: strong. 5 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid JSON-LD present with Organization, WebSite, and BreadcrumbList. Missing more granular content schemas like FAQ or Product.

    Authority & Trust Signals75/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong social proof with Fortune 100 mentions, but lacks visible publication dates and explicit editorial standards.

    Citation & Source Quality50/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Claims are made (e.g., 85% of Fortune 100) but lack direct outbound links to the primary data sources for verification.

    Content Freshness25/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible publication or modification dates found on the homepage. Copyright year is not a sufficient freshness signal for LLMs.

    Content Structure95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent use of H1-H5 hierarchy and semantic HTML sections. Content is highly organized for machine readability.

    Entity Definition85/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong Organization schema and consistent branding. About page is present but author/founder entities could be more deeply linked.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent meta descriptions and social meta tags. Content is well-structured for AI crawlers.

    How asana.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Visible Update Dates (high priority)
    • Add FAQ Schema (high priority)
    • Enhance Trust Transparency (medium priority)
    • Strengthen Author Entities (medium priority)
    • Cite Primary Data Sources (low priority)

    How asana.com compares to its competitors