LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-20

    How AI assistants see paco.design

    paco.design has an AI visibility score of 38/100. The site passed 13 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Citation & Source Quality and Readability. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read paco.design

    Readability70/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Very high readability with concise sentences and clear language.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Completely lacks JSON-LD schema markup.

    Authority & Trust Signals20/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Lacks formal trust pages and structured author credentials, though contact info is partially present.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of inline citations for projects, but lacks links to high-authority external reference sites.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No explicit publication or modification dates found in metadata or visible text.

    Content Structure64/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy but lacks semantic sectioning and a table of contents.

    Entity Definition25/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Entity is clear through text but lacks structured data and a dedicated about page.

    Technical Accessibility70/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and JS independence, but missing standard meta description.

    How paco.design can improve its AI visibility

    • Add JSON-LD Schema Markup (high priority)
    • Create a Dedicated About Page (high priority)
    • Add Trust and Legal Pages (medium priority)
    • Fix Meta Description Attribute (medium priority)
    • Surface Publication Dates (medium priority)

    How paco.design compares to its competitors