LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-04-06

    How AI assistants see openbank.es

    openbank.es has an AI visibility score of 75/100. The site passed 26 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Freshness and Readability. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read openbank.es

    Readability85/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Clear, active voice with good jargon handling for a financial site.

    Schema.org Markup60/100

    Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Basic JSON-LD present (Organization, WebSite), but missing deep product-specific schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals75/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong institutional trust signals with physical address and regulatory mentions, but lacks individual author expertise.

    Citation & Source Quality60/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Claims are well-supported by internal legal documents, but lacks external authoritative outbound links.

    Content Freshness95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent recency with multiple 2026 dates and promotional deadlines.

    Content Structure65/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Semantic HTML is present, but heading hierarchy is fragmented with multiple H2s and H3s used for layout.

    Entity Definition70/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Brand entity is clear, but individual expert entities (authors) are undefined.

    Technical Accessibility80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Good meta descriptions and social tags, but no specific AI crawler directives found.

    How openbank.es can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement FinancialProduct Schema (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
    • Optimize robots.txt for AI Agents (high priority)
    • Define Author Entities (medium priority)
    • Add Regulatory Citations (medium priority)

    How openbank.es compares to its competitors