AI search visibility report · 2026-10-29
How AI assistants see amberdata.io
amberdata.io has an AI visibility score of 40/100. The site passed 12 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read amberdata.io
Readability50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
The content is highly technical and dense, resulting in a very low Flesch Reading Ease score.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Complete absence of JSON-LD or any structured data markup.
Authority & Trust Signals35/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Lacks specific trust signals like physical addresses and publication dates. Social proof is present in text but not structured.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of inline citations for claims, though lacks links to high-authority external domains like .gov or .edu.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No dates found in metadata or visible text to verify content recency.
Content Structure60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of semantic HTML but fails on heading hierarchy with zero H1 tags and skipped levels.
Entity Definition30/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Brand consistency is strong, but lacks a dedicated about page and author identification.
Technical Accessibility85/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent AI crawler access and JS independence, but meta description is too short.
How amberdata.io can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
- Fix Heading Hierarchy and Add H1 (high priority)
- Add Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
- Enhance Entity Definition and About Page (medium priority)
- Optimize Meta Description Length (medium priority)
How amberdata.io compares to its competitors
- Coin Metrics (coinmetrics.io) — score 52/100
- Glassnode (glassnode.com) — score 78/100
- Dune Analytics (dune.com) — score 78/100
- Messari (messari.io) — score 78/100