AI search visibility report ยท 2026-06-05
How AI assistants see perplexity.ai
perplexity.ai has an AI visibility score of 30/100. The site passed 10 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read perplexity.ai
Readability80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good sentence length and clarity, though Flesch-Kincaid is slightly low for general audiences.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD or microdata schema found on the page.
Authority & Trust Signals0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
The homepage lacks visible trust signals like contact info, trust pages, or publication dates.
Citation & Source Quality0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No outbound links or citations are present on the landing page.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No dates or update signals were found in the HTML or visible text.
Content Structure53/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Missing H1 and semantic sections, though paragraph structure is good.
Entity Definition25/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Lacks an About page and specific entity definitions in the markup.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with AI crawler access and social meta tags.
How perplexity.ai can improve its AI visibility
- Add Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
- Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
- Develop About Page and Entity Data (medium priority)
- Surface Trust and Contact Pages (medium priority)
- Add Visible Recency Signals (low priority)
How perplexity.ai compares to its competitors
- OpenAI (ChatGPT) (openai.com) โ score 52/100
- Google (Gemini) (google.com)
- Anthropic (Claude) (anthropic.com) โ score 36/100
- Microsoft (Copilot) (microsoft.com)