LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-26

    How AI assistants see upside.com

    upside.com has an AI visibility score of 44/100. The site passed 14 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read upside.com

    Readability80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is clear and uses appropriate sentence lengths for a general audience.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    No JSON-LD or microdata was found on the page.

    Authority & Trust Signals40/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    The site lacks verifiable contact details and publication dates, though it has strong social proof and trust pages.

    Citation & Source Quality60/100

    Result: average. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Factual claims are linked internally but lack citations to authoritative third-party sources.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible or machine-readable dates are present to indicate content recency.

    Content Structure45/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Heading hierarchy is broken with multiple H1s and skipped levels. Semantic HTML usage is minimal.

    Entity Definition58/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    The brand is consistent and has an about page, but lacks author and organization schema.

    Technical Accessibility85/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and meta tags, with moderate dependency on JavaScript.

    How upside.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Add Verifiable Contact Information (high priority)
    • Display Content Update Signals (medium priority)
    • Repair Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Links (medium priority)

    How upside.com compares to its competitors