LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-26

    How AI assistants see fetch.com

    fetch.com has an AI visibility score of 54/100. The site passed 16 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read fetch.com

    Readability70/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentence length is good, but the reading ease score is low due to complex vocabulary.

    Schema.org Markup60/100

    Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    JSON-LD is present and valid, but lacks the core and content schemas necessary for LLM context.

    Authority & Trust Signals30/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Trust pages are present, but contact information and publication dates are missing. Social proof lacks schema.

    Citation & Source Quality48/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks authoritative outbound links and formal inline citations for claims.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No publication or modification dates are detectable in the code or visible text.

    Content Structure79/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML, but paragraph structure is fragmented.

    Entity Definition48/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    About page exists, but author identification and term definitions are weak.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social meta tags.

    How fetch.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core Entity Schemas (high priority)
    • Define Authoritative Entities (high priority)
    • Add Visible Modification Dates (medium priority)
    • Complete Contact Information (medium priority)
    • Simplify Content Language (low priority)

    How fetch.com compares to its competitors