AI search visibility report · 2026-06-21
How AI assistants see crewai.com
crewai.com has an AI visibility score of 54/100. The site passed 20 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Entity Definition.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read crewai.com
Readability50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Sentences are overly long and complex, resulting in a low readability score.
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Valid JSON-LD present for Organization and Video, but missing critical content-level schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof with Fortune 500 mentions, but lacks physical contact details and author credentials.
Citation & Source Quality60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of internal links and case studies, but lacks external authoritative citations.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No visible publication or modification dates found on the page.
Content Structure68/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of semantic HTML and sections, but has skipped heading levels.
Entity Definition40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Brand consistency is high, but lacks a dedicated about page and author bios.
Technical Accessibility93/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent AI crawler access and social metadata implementation.
How crewai.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Visible Date Stamps (high priority)
- Expand Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
- Strengthen Author/Entity Authority (medium priority)
- Enhance Contact Transparency (medium priority)
- Improve Content Readability (low priority)
How crewai.com compares to its competitors
- LangChain (langchain.com) — score 79/100
- Microsoft AutoGen (autogen-ai.com) — score 62/100
- OpenAI (Swarm/Assistants) (openai.com) — score 52/100
- Zapier (Central) (zapier.com) — score 43/100