AI search visibility report · 2026-10-29
How AI assistants see kaiko.com
kaiko.com has an AI visibility score of 36/100. The site passed 10 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read kaiko.com
Readability60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Sentence length is ideal, but the technical complexity results in a very low Flesch Reading Ease score.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Total absence of JSON-LD or any structured data markup.
Authority & Trust Signals26/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
The site lacks physical address data and specific author credentials. Trust pages are limited to terms.
Citation & Source Quality16/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Very few outbound links to authoritative sources and no inline citations for factual claims.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No publication or modification dates are visible or present in the metadata.
Content Structure68/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of semantic HTML and sections, but heading hierarchy has skipped levels and paragraphs are too short.
Entity Definition35/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
No dedicated about page or author identification. Entity consistency is good but lacks schema support.
Technical Accessibility95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and meta-tag implementation. Content is accessible without JavaScript.
How kaiko.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
- Add Verifiable Contact Information (high priority)
- Surface Content Update Signals (high priority)
- Establish Clear Entity Definition (medium priority)
- Include Authoritative Outbound Citations (medium priority)
- Improve Content Readability Score (low priority)
How kaiko.com compares to its competitors
- Coin Metrics (coinmetrics.io) — score 52/100
- Amberdata (amberdata.io) — score 40/100
- Glassnode (glassnode.com) — score 78/100
- Dune Analytics (dune.com) — score 78/100
- Chainalysis (chainalysis.com)