AI search visibility report ยท 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see interactivebrokers.com
interactivebrokers.com has an AI visibility score of 68/100. The site passed 27 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Citation & Source Quality.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read interactivebrokers.com
Readability75/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Professional tone, though navigation labels are dense. Jargon is mostly appropriate for the audience.
Schema.org Markup50/100
Result: weak. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Basic Organization schema present, but missing industry-specific financial schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals75/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong institutional trust signals, but lacks individual author expertise schema.
Citation & Source Quality60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good internal linking to disclosures, but lacks external primary source citations for market claims.
Content Freshness70/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Content references 2026 events, showing high recency, but lacks specific metadata timestamps.
Content Structure65/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good semantic use of sections, but lacks a clear H1 and has a complex navigation-heavy structure.
Entity Definition70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Organization is well-defined, but lacks specific term definitions on the homepage.
Technical Accessibility80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good meta descriptions and social tags, but high dependency on CSS for layout.
How interactivebrokers.com can improve its AI visibility
- Expand Schema to Financial Entities (high priority)
- Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
- Implement Author Schema for YMYL Content (medium priority)
- Add Visible Freshness Signals (medium priority)
- Optimize AI Crawler Access (low priority)
How interactivebrokers.com compares to its competitors
- Charles Schwab (schwab.com) โ score 68/100
- Fidelity Investments (fidelity.com) โ score 54/100
- E*TRADE (Morgan Stanley) (etrade.com) โ score 79/100
- TD Ameritrade (tdameritrade.com)