LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-18

    How AI assistants see domestika.org

    domestika.org has an AI visibility score of 60/100. The site passed 19 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read domestika.org

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely long sentences and poor Flesch-Kincaid scores hinder readability.

    Schema.org Markup74/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid core schemas present, but missing specific content schemas for courses.

    Authority & Trust Signals52/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong contact and trust pages, but lacks instructor credentials and publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of inline links, but lacks links to high-authority external domains.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible or machine-readable dates found on the page.

    Content Structure80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage. Paragraph structure is slightly weak.

    Entity Definition60/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong About page and brand consistency, but lacks specific author/instructor entities.

    Technical Accessibility93/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and social meta tags. Meta description is slightly long.

    How domestika.org can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Visible Content Dates (high priority)
    • Shorten Sentence Length (high priority)
    • Add Course and Product Schema (medium priority)
    • Enhance Author Identification (medium priority)
    • Improve Outbound Link Quality (low priority)

    How domestika.org compares to its competitors