AI search visibility report · 2026-06-21
How AI assistants see codecademy.com
codecademy.com has an AI visibility score of 65/100. The site passed 22 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read codecademy.com
Readability100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Content is highly readable with appropriate sentence lengths and clear jargon handling.
Schema.org Markup68/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Valid Organization schema present, but missing critical content-specific schemas like Course or FAQ.
Authority & Trust Signals40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong trust pages and address, but lacks specific author credentials and social proof in schema format.
Citation & Source Quality77/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of internal linking and factual claims, but lacks outbound links to high-authority external documentation.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Complete lack of visible or metadata-based dates makes it difficult for LLMs to determine content recency.
Content Structure80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage. Content is well-organized for machine readability.
Entity Definition60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and about page, but lacks author-level entity definitions.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social metadata.
How codecademy.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
- Expand Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
- Enhance Author Credentials (medium priority)
- Improve Outbound Authority Links (medium priority)
- Implement Person Schema for Authors (low priority)
How codecademy.com compares to its competitors
- Udemy (udemy.com) — score 48/100
- Coursera (coursera.org) — score 57/100
- freeCodeCamp (freecodecamp.org) — score 51/100
- Pluralsight (pluralsight.com) — score 51/100
- DataCamp (datacamp.com)