AI search visibility report · 2026-06-06
How AI assistants see riotgames.com
riotgames.com has an AI visibility score of 40/100. The site passed 13 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read riotgames.com
Readability55/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good reading ease score but excessively long sentences hinder clarity.
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Valid JSON-LD present but limited to basic WebPage/WebSite types; lacks rich content schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals10/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Lacks specific contact details, author credentials, and publication dates, though trust pages like Terms are present.
Citation & Source Quality17/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
High volume of external links but none to authoritative third-party sources; no inline citations for claims.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No dates found in metadata or visible text to verify content recency.
Content Structure55/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good semantic HTML usage but flawed heading hierarchy with multiple H1s.
Entity Definition25/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Consistent branding but lacks an About page link and Person/Organization schema.
Technical Accessibility78/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent AI crawler access and social meta, though partial JS dependency exists.
How riotgames.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Organization and Product Schema (high priority)
- Improve Transparency and Contact Signals (high priority)
- Expose Publication Dates (medium priority)
- Implement Inline Citations (medium priority)
- Optimize Sentence Length for Clarity (medium priority)
How riotgames.com compares to its competitors
- Blizzard Entertainment (blizzard.com) — score 39/100
- Valve Corporation (valvesoftware.com) — score 39/100
- Epic Games (epicgames.com) — score 41/100
- Electronic Arts (ea.com) — score 56/100