LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-05

    How AI assistants see duckduckgo.com

    duckduckgo.com has an AI visibility score of 47/100. The site passed 16 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read duckduckgo.com

    Readability60/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are significantly longer than the recommended 20-word average.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Complete absence of JSON-LD schema markup.

    Authority & Trust Signals28/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Lacks specific contact details and publication dates, though trust pages are present.

    Citation & Source Quality72/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong inline citations but lacks links to high-authority external domains like .gov or .edu.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No machine-readable or visible publication/modification dates found.

    Content Structure72/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of semantic HTML but flawed heading hierarchy with multiple H1s and skipped levels.

    Entity Definition58/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Clear brand consistency and About page, but lacks Person schema for authors.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and social metadata.

    How duckduckgo.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add JSON-LD Schema Markup (high priority)
    • Improve Contact Transparency (high priority)
    • Add Visible Content Dates (medium priority)
    • Optimize Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
    • Implement Author Schema (low priority)

    How duckduckgo.com compares to its competitors