AI search visibility report ยท 2026-06-05
How AI assistants see bing.com
bing.com has an AI visibility score of 28/100. The site passed 7 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read bing.com
Readability25/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely low readability score due to long, complex sentences in the news carousel and lack of paragraph breaks.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Zero JSON-LD blocks found. This is a major missed opportunity for a search engine to define itself to other AI agents.
Authority & Trust Signals8/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Lacks visible contact info, trust pages, and publication dates on the homepage. Trust is inherited from the brand rather than on-page signals.
Citation & Source Quality47/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
High volume of external links (news carousel), but lacks formal citations or primary source attribution for homepage claims.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
While the news content is clearly current (June 2026), there are no machine-readable publication or modification dates in the code.
Content Structure36/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Missing H1 and paragraph tags. Semantic HTML is present but the content hierarchy is flat.
Entity Definition35/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
No dedicated About page or Person schema for authors. Entity consistency is high due to brand dominance.
Technical Accessibility88/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and JS-independent content. Meta description is present but slightly long.
How bing.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
- Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
- Implement Paragraph Tags (medium priority)
- Expose Trust Pages (medium priority)
- Strengthen Entity Definition (low priority)
How bing.com compares to its competitors
- Google Search (google.com)
- DuckDuckGo (duckduckgo.com) โ score 47/100
- Perplexity AI (perplexity.ai) โ score 30/100
- OpenAI (SearchGPT) (openai.com) โ score 52/100