LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-07

    How AI assistants see scrimba.com

    scrimba.com has an AI visibility score of 48/100. The site passed 16 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Freshness and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Authority & Trust Signals.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read scrimba.com

    Readability65/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are slightly long for general audiences, but clarity is high.

    Schema.org Markup60/100

    Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid JSON-LD present but missing core Organization and WebSite schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals20/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong publication dates but lacks contact transparency and trust pages.

    Citation & Source Quality0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Zero outbound links or inline citations found in the analyzed content.

    Content Freshness75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent recency with content modified within the last 8 days.

    Content Structure63/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Good heading hierarchy but lacks semantic HTML depth and paragraph length.

    Entity Definition35/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Consistent branding but lacks an About page and Person schema for instructors.

    Technical Accessibility70/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and JS independence, but missing meta description.

    How scrimba.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Expand Core Schema Implementation (high priority)
    • Add Meta Description (high priority)
    • Establish Dedicated About Page (medium priority)
    • Improve Contact Transparency (medium priority)
    • Implement Outbound Citations (low priority)

    How scrimba.com compares to its competitors