LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-05

    How AI assistants see corel.com

    corel.com has an AI visibility score of 39/100. The site passed 12 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read corel.com

    Readability55/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are significantly longer than the LLM-optimized threshold, though jargon is handled reasonably well.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Complete absence of JSON-LD structured data, which is a critical failure for LLM discovery.

    Authority & Trust Signals44/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong trust pages and contact info, but lacks structured author credentials and social proof schema.

    Citation & Source Quality47/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of inline links for navigation, but lacks citations to authoritative third-party sources.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Copyright is current (2026), but specific content publication or modification dates are entirely absent.

    Content Structure59/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Uses semantic sections but suffers from multiple H1s and skipped heading levels.

    Entity Definition33/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Clear brand consistency and About page, but lacks structured Person/Organization schema to define entities for LLMs.

    Technical Accessibility85/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and meta descriptions, with minor JS dependency issues.

    How corel.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add JSON-LD Structured Data (high priority)
    • Implement Author/Expert Schema (high priority)
    • Surface Publication & Update Dates (medium priority)
    • Optimize Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
    • Enhance External Citations (low priority)

    How corel.com compares to its competitors