AI search visibility report · 2026-10-30
How AI assistants see covalenthq.com
covalenthq.com has an AI visibility score of 59/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read covalenthq.com
Readability60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Sentence length is acceptable, but the overall reading ease is too low for general audiences.
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
JSON-LD is valid and core schemas are present, but content-specific schemas are missing.
Authority & Trust Signals44/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
Trust pages are present, but the lack of physical contact data and publication dates reduces the trust score.
Citation & Source Quality67/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Inline citations are present, but the site lacks links to high-authority external domains like .gov or .edu.
Content Freshness15/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
The site shows update signals in the changelog, but lacks machine-readable publication dates in schema.
Content Structure67/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Heading hierarchy is excellent. Semantic HTML and paragraph structure need improvement.
Entity Definition55/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
The About page and Organization schema are strong, but author identification is missing.
Technical Accessibility85/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Crawler access and social meta are excellent. The meta description is significantly too long.
How covalenthq.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Physical Contact Information (high priority)
- Implement Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
- Define Author Entities (medium priority)
- Improve Content Readability (medium priority)
- Optimize Meta Description Length (low priority)
How covalenthq.com compares to its competitors
- Dune Analytics (dune.com) — score 78/100
- The Graph (thegraph.com) — score 75/100
- Nansen (nansen.ai) — score 74/100
- Alchemy (alchemy.com) — score 78/100