LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-18

    How AI assistants see public.com

    public.com has an AI visibility score of 75/100. The site passed 27 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Citation & Source Quality and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read public.com

    Readability80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is clear and uses appropriate sentence lengths for a general audience.

    Schema.org Markup74/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Basic Organization schema is present and valid, but specific product and content schemas are missing.

    Authority & Trust Signals60/100

    Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Trust signals are moderate. Contact info is incomplete and author credentials lack structured data. Trust pages are present.

    Citation & Source Quality100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent use of authoritative outbound links and inline citations for financial claims.

    Content Freshness50/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Recency is high due to October 2026 updates, but publication dates and update logs are missing.

    Content Structure86/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage. Paragraphs are well-structured for readability.

    Entity Definition65/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    About page is strong, but author identification is weak. Entity consistency is maintained.

    Technical Accessibility93/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and social meta tags.

    How public.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Content-Specific Schemas (high priority)
    • Enhance Author Identification (high priority)
    • Add Update Signals and Visible Dates (medium priority)
    • Define Key Financial Entities (medium priority)
    • Complete Contact Information Profile (medium priority)

    How public.com compares to its competitors