AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see santiment.net
santiment.net has an AI visibility score of 69/100. The site passed 21 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Structure and Readability. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Content Freshness.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read santiment.net
Readability85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
High clarity with professional tone. Technical terms like 'on-chain' and 'MVRV' (implied) are handled well within context.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD blocks were detected in the provided HTML. This is a significant missed opportunity for LLM optimization.
Authority & Trust Signals65/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof via testimonials and 'As seen on' logos, but lacks clear publication dates and formal editorial policies.
Citation & Source Quality40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Claims are generally self-referential to their own data platform. Lacks external citations to primary research or third-party data.
Content Freshness25/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
No visible publication or modification dates on the homepage. Copyright year is not explicitly stated in the footer text provided.
Content Structure90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of H1-H3 hierarchy and semantic sections. Content is well-organized for both users and LLM parsers.
Entity Definition70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and clear 'About' links, but lacks structured Person entities for the team.
Technical Accessibility85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good meta descriptions and social tags. Content is highly accessible and uses modern framework (Astro).
How santiment.net can improve its AI visibility
- Implement JSON-LD Structured Data (high priority)
- Publish Data Methodology & Editorial Standards (high priority)
- Define Author Entities with Person Schema (medium priority)
- Add Visible Update Signals (medium priority)
- Strengthen External Citations (low priority)
How santiment.net compares to its competitors
- Glassnode (glassnode.com) — score 78/100
- Messari (messari.io) — score 78/100
- Dune Analytics (dune.com) — score 78/100
- Nansen (nansen.ai) — score 74/100
- CryptoQuant (cryptoquant.com) — score 78/100