LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-18

    How AI assistants see interaction-design.org

    interaction-design.org has an AI visibility score of 63/100. The site passed 20 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read interaction-design.org

    Readability60/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is moderately difficult to read (Flesch 49.8) with long average sentence lengths.

    Schema.org Markup74/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Core technical schema is valid, but missing critical content-specific schemas like Course or FAQ.

    Authority & Trust Signals42/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong social proof with Don Norman and IBM endorsements, but lacks specific contact details and publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of internal links for claims, but lacks links to high-authority external domains (.gov, .edu).

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Complete absence of date signals makes it difficult for LLMs to determine content recency.

    Content Structure85/100

    Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage, though paragraph length is very short.

    Entity Definition65/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong organizational identity and About page, but lacks structured Person schema for its many experts.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social metadata.

    How interaction-design.org can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Visible Publication and Update Dates (high priority)
    • Deploy Content-Specific Schema Markup (high priority)
    • Enhance Author Entity Definitions (high priority)
    • Improve Outbound Link Authority (medium priority)
    • Complete Contact Information Transparency (medium priority)

    How interaction-design.org compares to its competitors